Fault & recovery

FELA Comparative Negligence: How Your Own Fault Affects Recovery

Last updated 21 June 2026

FELA uses pure comparative negligence under 45 U.S.C. §53. That means your own carelessness reduces your recovery in proportion to your share of fault — but it never wipes the claim out entirely. And if the railroad violated a federal safety statute, your fault is not counted at all.

Informational only. This page provides general legal information, not legal advice. TrainAccidentLawyer.us is not a law firm and no attorney–client relationship is created by reading it. FELA cases turn on their specific facts and on current law; consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before acting.

The statute: Under 45 U.S.C. §53, contributory negligence does not bar recovery but “the damages shall be diminished by the jury in proportion to the amount of negligence attributable to such employee.” The same section removes that reduction when the railroad violated a safety statute enacted for employee safety.

Pure comparative negligence, in plain terms

If a jury finds you 30% at fault, your award is reduced by 30% — you still recover the other 70%. There is no cutoff. This is different from many state injury laws that use “modified” comparative negligence and bar recovery once a plaintiff is 50% or 51% at fault. FELA has no such bar.

Your share of faultWhat you recover
0%100% of damages
25%75% of damages
50%50% of damages
90%10% of damages

The safety-statute exception (the big one)

Section 53 contains a powerful carve-out: if the railroad violated a federal statute enacted for the safety of employees — such as the Locomotive Inspection Act or the Safety Appliance Act — and that violation contributed to the injury, the worker’s contributory negligence is disregarded entirely. The award is not reduced at all.

How railroads use comparative fault

Because any percentage of worker fault lowers the payout, railroads often argue the worker contributed — by not following a rule, by haste, or by “assuming the risk.” Two points matter:

  • Assumption of risk is abolished under 45 U.S.C. §54 — doing the job is not accepting the danger.
  • Following the railroad’s direction or working short-handed is not automatically the worker’s fault; that can be the railroad’s negligence.

Why it matters in negotiation

Comparative fault is one of the main levers in a FELA negotiation. Strong evidence that the railroad’s negligence — not the worker’s — caused the injury both raises liability and shrinks the fault discount. Our calculator applies the pure comparative rule so you can see the effect of different fault percentages.

Watch the framing. A claim agent may push a high “your fault” percentage to justify a low offer. That figure is negotiable and, in a safety-statute case, may not apply at all.

What kind of comparative negligence does FELA use?
FELA uses pure comparative negligence under 45 U.S.C. §53. Your damages are reduced by your percentage of fault, but you can still recover even if you were mostly at fault — there is no 50% or 51% bar.
If I was partly at fault, can I still recover under FELA?
Yes. Your award is reduced in proportion to your fault but never eliminated. If the railroad violated a safety statute that contributed to the injury, your fault is disregarded entirely.
What is the safety-statute exception in FELA?
Under 45 U.S.C. §53, if the railroad violated a federal statute enacted for employee safety — like the Locomotive Inspection Act or Safety Appliance Act — and that violation contributed to the injury, the worker's contributory negligence is not counted at all.
Can the railroad say I assumed the risk?
No. Assumption of risk is abolished under 45 U.S.C. §54. Performing the job does not mean the worker legally accepted the danger.

Related FELA & railroad-injury guides

Editor portrait placeholder

Reviewed by the TrainAccidentLawyer.us editorial team

Published by Mustafa Bilgic. Our guides are written for general education and fact-checked against primary U.S. sources — the Federal Railroad Administration, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the text of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U.S.C. §§51–60). We cite institutions, not anonymous “experts.” This page is informational and is not legal advice.

See how fault changes the number

Adjust the fault percentage in the calculator to watch pure comparative negligence work the way FELA §53 does.

Estimate my FELA case